← all cases

Compare Costco and PepsiCo on inventory turnover.

partial
clarity
4/5
comparison
4/5
evidence
5/5
honesty
4/5
faithfulness
5.0/5
elapsed
0.7s

Report

Inventory Turnover

Insufficient data


Profitability

Costco and PepsiCo occupy very different profitability profiles despite both showing multi-year revenue growth. Costco operates on razor-thin margins characteristic of warehouse retail: on FY2025 revenues of $275.2B [COST:Q3], it generated operating income of $10.4B [COST:Q11] and net income of $8.1B [COST:Q7], implying an operating margin of roughly 3.8% and a net margin of roughly 2.9%. Yet Costco's absolute earnings trajectory is strongly upward, with net income rising meaningfully from FY2022 levels through FY2025 [COST:Q7], reflecting disciplined cost management and the leverage of its membership model. PepsiCo, by contrast, benefits from a branded consumer-goods model with far richer margins: on FY2024 revenues of $91.9B [PEP:Q2] it posted gross profit of $50.1B [PEP:Q14] and operating income of $12.9B [PEP:Q10], implying a gross margin above 54% and an operating margin near 14%. However, PepsiCo's profitability has faced near-term headwinds in FY2025, with operating income declining to approximately $11.5B [PEP:Q11] and net income pulling back to approximately $8.2B [PEP:Q7] after stronger FY2024 results [PEP:Q6][PEP:Q10], suggesting cost or volume pressures are compressing earnings even as revenues edged higher. In absolute net income terms the two companies have converged—Costco at $8.1B [COST:Q7] versus PepsiCo at $8.2B [PEP:Q7] in FY2025—but PepsiCo achieves that on roughly one-third of Costco's revenue base, underscoring its structurally superior margin profile even amid near-term softness.

COST: Costco's profitability is defined by high-volume, low-margin warehouse retailing, yet its earnings power has compounded impressively: operating income grew from $7.8B in FY2022 [COST:Q8] to $10.4B in FY2025 [COST:Q11], and net income has risen consistently over the same span to $8.1B [COST:Q7]. Revenue growth of roughly 21% over four years [COST:Q0][COST:Q3] has translated into consistent bottom-line expansion, reflecting disciplined cost management and the leverage of its membership model.

PEP: PepsiCo commands structurally superior margins—gross profit of $50.9B on $93.9B of FY2025 revenues [PEP:Q15][PEP:Q3] implies a gross margin above 54%—but its profitability momentum has stalled. Operating income declined to approximately $11.5B [PEP:Q11] and net income fell to approximately $8.2B [PEP:Q7] in FY2025, retreating from stronger FY2024 levels [PEP:Q10][PEP:Q6]. The FY2025 pullback signals cost or volume pressures compressing earnings even as revenues edged modestly higher.


Cross-Axis Takeaway

Critic flags (2)

weakly_supportedprofitability
net income rising from $5.8B in FY2022 [COST:Q4]
The value $5.844B rounds correctly to $5.8B and is confirmed by XBRL data. However, the citation tag [COST:Q4] is an opaque retrieval index with no period mapping provided, and the formal citation list does not include a period-disambiguated FY2022 net income entry — only a generic 'quant:COST:us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss' reference. The number is correct but the citation trail is not fully transparent.
weakly_supportedprofitability
PepsiCo's profitability deteriorated in FY2025, with operating income falling to $11.5B and net income declining to $8.2B from a peak of $9.6B in FY2024
All three figures are numerically correct per XBRL (FY2025 OI $11.498B, FY2025 NI $8.240B, FY2024 NI $9.578B). However, none of the PEP operating income or PEP net income citations appear in the formal citation list at the bottom of the analysis, making independent verification of sourcing difficult. The claim is factually accurate but inadequately cited in the citation manifest.

Cross-axis notes

The inline citation index labels (e.g., [COST:Q3], [PEP:Q14]) are retrieval-result ordinals, not fiscal quarter identifiers. This naming convention could mislead readers into thinking cited figures are quarterly rather than annual totals.
The formal citation list at the bottom of the analysis is incomplete: it only enumerates COST revenue and net income XBRL concepts, but the narrative also relies on PEP gross profit, PEP operating income, and COST operating income — none of which appear in the citation list.
The analysis omits that PEP FY2025 revenue grew to $93.925B even as net income fell to $8.240B, implying margin compression rather than a pure volume decline — this cross-cuts both the profitability and any potential revenue-quality axis.

Citations (28)

quant COST FY2022
us-gaap:Revenues = $226.95B
quant COST FY2023
us-gaap:Revenues = $242.29B
quant COST FY2024
us-gaap:Revenues = $254.45B
quant COST FY2025
us-gaap:Revenues = $275.24B
quant COST FY2022
us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss = $5.84B
quant COST FY2023
us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss = $6.29B
quant COST FY2024
us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss = $7.37B
quant COST FY2025
us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss = $8.10B
quant COST FY2022
us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss = $7.79B
quant COST FY2023
us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss = $8.11B
quant COST FY2024
us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss = $9.29B
quant COST FY2025
us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss = $10.38B
quant PEP FY2022
us-gaap:Revenues = $86.39B
quant PEP FY2023
us-gaap:Revenues = $91.47B
quant PEP FY2024
us-gaap:Revenues = $91.85B
quant PEP FY2025
us-gaap:Revenues = $93.92B
quant PEP FY2022
us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss = $8.91B
quant PEP FY2023
us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss = $9.07B
quant PEP FY2024
us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss = $9.58B
quant PEP FY2025
us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss = $8.24B
quant PEP FY2022
us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss = $11.51B
quant PEP FY2023
us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss = $11.99B
quant PEP FY2024
us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss = $12.89B
quant PEP FY2025
us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss = $11.50B
quant PEP FY2022
us-gaap:GrossProfit = $45.82B
quant PEP FY2023
us-gaap:GrossProfit = $49.59B
quant PEP FY2024
us-gaap:GrossProfit = $50.11B
quant PEP FY2025
us-gaap:GrossProfit = $50.86B