Both PG and KO have delivered steady top-line growth over the FY2022âFY2025 period, though at modestly different rates. PG grew revenues from $80.2B in FY2022 [PG:Q0] to $84.3B in FY2025 [PG:Q3], a cumulative gain of roughly 5% over three years, with growth slowing noticeably in the final year (FY2024 to FY2025 was essentially flat at ~0.3%). KO expanded from $43.0B in FY2022 [KO:Q0] to $47.9B in FY2025 [KO:Q3], a cumulative gain of approximately 11%, with the largest single-year jump occurring between FY2022 and FY2023 [KO:Q1]. On a percentage basis, KO has outpaced PG in revenue growth across this window, though PG operates at nearly twice the absolute revenue scale. Both companies show decelerating growth in the most recent year, with KO's FY2024-to-FY2025 step-up of roughly $880M [KO:Q2, KO:Q3] representing a slower pace than prior years.
PG: PG has grown revenues steadily from $80.2B in FY2022 [PG:Q0] to $84.3B in FY2025 [PG:Q3], but the trajectory has flattened, with FY2025 revenues barely above FY2024's $84.0B [PG:Q2], implying near-stagnation in the most recent fiscal year. Cumulative three-year growth of roughly 5% suggests a mature, low-single-digit growth profile consistent with a large-cap consumer staples leader.
KO: KO has posted stronger percentage growth than PG, expanding revenues from $43.0B in FY2022 [KO:Q0] to $47.9B in FY2025 [KO:Q3], a cumulative increase of approximately 11%. Growth has been consistent year-over-year [KO:Q1, KO:Q2, KO:Q3], though the pace has moderated in FY2025, reflecting a broader deceleration trend seen across the consumer staples sector.
Note: The question asks specifically about capital expenditures, but no capex axis data was provided in the per-axis comparisons. The analysis above reflects the only grounded axis available â revenue growth. A direct comparison of PG and KO capital expenditure levels, trends, and intensity (capex as a percentage of revenue) cannot be completed without the underlying capex figures.
No claims flagged.