← all cases

Compare Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Costco on profitability.

ok
clarity
5/5
comparison
5/5
evidence
5/5
honesty
5/5
faithfulness
5.0/5
elapsed
0.8s

Report

Profitability

Across the three companies, KO stands out for its superior margin profile despite being the smallest by revenue, while PEP operates at a larger scale with moderately high but recently pressured margins, and COST runs a high-volume, razor-thin-margin warehouse model that nonetheless generates strong absolute earnings growth.

KO grew revenues from $43.0B in FY2022 [KO:Q0] to $47.9B in FY2025 [KO:Q3], while delivering a net margin that expanded to roughly 27% in FY2025 (net income $13.1B [KO:Q7] on revenues of $47.9B [KO:Q3]). Gross margins have trended upward in recent years, reaching approximately 61.6% in FY2025 (gross profit $29.5B [KO:Q15]), though this 60%+ threshold was only achieved in FY2024 and FY2025 — earlier years ran closer to 58–60%. PEP operates at roughly double KO's revenue scale ($93.9B in FY2025 [PEP:Q3]) and generates the largest absolute gross profit of the three ($50.9B in FY2025 [PEP:Q15]), but profitability has deteriorated meaningfully: net income fell to $8.2B in FY2025 [PEP:Q7] from $9.6B in FY2024 [PEP:Q6] — and notably, FY2025 net income also sits below FY2022 levels of approximately $8.9B, indicating a more sustained earnings erosion than a single-year comparison would suggest. Operating income similarly slipped to $11.5B [PEP:Q11] from $12.9B [PEP:Q10], signaling ongoing cost pressures. COST dwarfs both in revenue ($275.2B in FY2025 [COST:Q3]), but its membership warehouse model produces structurally thin net margins of roughly 2.9%. Despite this, COST has delivered the strongest absolute earnings growth trajectory among the three, with net income rising from $5.8B in FY2022 [COST:Q4] to $8.1B in FY2025 [COST:Q7] and operating income climbing from $7.8B [COST:Q8] to $10.4B [COST:Q11], reflecting consistent operational leverage as membership and volume scale up.

KO: Coca-Cola demonstrates the strongest margin profile of the three, with gross profit reaching $29.5B on $47.9B in revenues in FY2025 [KO:Q15][KO:Q3], implying a gross margin of approximately 61.6% — a level achieved in FY2024 and FY2025 as margins have trended upward. Net income surged to $13.1B in FY2025 [KO:Q7], up from $10.6B in FY2024 [KO:Q6], and operating income recovered strongly to $13.8B [KO:Q11] after a dip to $10.0B in FY2024 [KO:Q10], reflecting KO's durable pricing power and high-margin concentrate business.

PEP: PepsiCo generates the largest absolute gross profit among the three ($50.9B in FY2025 [PEP:Q15]) on revenues of $93.9B [PEP:Q3], but profitability has deteriorated over a multi-year period: net income fell to $8.2B in FY2025 [PEP:Q7] from $9.6B in FY2024 [PEP:Q6] and is also below FY2022 levels of approximately $8.9B, while operating income declined to $11.5B [PEP:Q11] from $12.9B [PEP:Q10], suggesting sustained cost pressures or structural headwinds weighing on the bottom line.

COST: Costco's warehouse membership model produces structurally thin net margins (roughly 2.9% in FY2025 on $275.2B in revenues [COST:Q3][COST:Q7]), but the company has delivered the most consistent earnings growth of the three, with net income rising to $8.1B in FY2025 [COST:Q7] from $5.8B in FY2022 [COST:Q4] and operating income expanding to $10.4B [COST:Q11] from $7.8B [COST:Q8], demonstrating strong operational leverage as membership and transaction volume scale up.


Cross-axis takeaway: On profitability, the three companies represent distinct archetypes: KO leads on margin quality with a high-return, asset-light concentrate model; COST leads on earnings growth momentum despite razor-thin margins, powered by scale and membership economics; and PEP finds itself in the most challenged position, with margin compression that extends beyond a single year and reflects broader cost and volume headwinds across its diversified food and beverage portfolio.

Critic flags (3)

weakly_supportedprofitability
gross margins consistently above 60% (gross profit $29.5B in FY2025)
FY2025 gross profit of $29.544B on $47.941B revenue = 61.6% gross margin is correct, but FY2022 gross margin was only ~58.1% ($25.004B / $43.004B) and FY2023 was ~59.5%. The word 'consistently' overstates the historical record; the 60%+ threshold was only reached in FY2024 and FY2025.
weakly_supportedprofitability
PEP net income declined to $8.2B in FY2025 from a peak of $9.6B in FY2024
The FY2024 peak ($9.578B) and FY2025 figure ($8.240B) are numerically correct, but framing FY2024 as the 'peak' omits that FY2025 net income ($8.240B) is also below FY2022 levels ($8.910B), making the deterioration more severe than the single-year framing implies.
weakly_supportedprofitability
All PEP and COST quantitative figures (revenues, net income, operating income)
No citations are provided for any PEP or COST figures in the citation block. While the numbers are independently verifiable and correct, the formal grounding of the analysis is incomplete — the citation list only covers KO:Revenues and KO:NetIncomeLoss.

Cross-axis notes

The citation block exclusively references KO XBRL concepts, leaving all PEP and COST quantitative claims without formal citations — this is a systemic grounding gap that would affect any axis relying on PEP or COST data.
The claim that KO has 'gross margins consistently above 60%' is undermined by FY2022 gross margin of ~58.1% ($25.004B gross profit / $43.004B revenue); the 60%+ threshold only holds from FY2023 onward, which is a meaningful distinction for a profitability trend narrative.
PEP's net income of $8.240B in FY2025 is actually below its FY2022 level of $8.910B — the analyst frames the decline only as a drop from FY2024's peak, missing the more bearish multi-year context.

Citations (44)

quant KO FY2022
us-gaap:Revenues = $43.00B
quant KO FY2023
us-gaap:Revenues = $45.75B
quant KO FY2024
us-gaap:Revenues = $47.06B
quant KO FY2025
us-gaap:Revenues = $47.94B
quant KO FY2022
us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss = $9.54B
quant KO FY2023
us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss = $10.71B
quant KO FY2024
us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss = $10.63B
quant KO FY2025
us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss = $13.11B
quant KO FY2022
us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss = $10.91B
quant KO FY2023
us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss = $11.31B
quant KO FY2024
us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss = $9.99B
quant KO FY2025
us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss = $13.76B
quant KO FY2022
us-gaap:GrossProfit = $25.00B
quant KO FY2023
us-gaap:GrossProfit = $27.23B
quant KO FY2024
us-gaap:GrossProfit = $28.74B
quant KO FY2025
us-gaap:GrossProfit = $29.54B
quant PEP FY2022
us-gaap:Revenues = $86.39B
quant PEP FY2023
us-gaap:Revenues = $91.47B
quant PEP FY2024
us-gaap:Revenues = $91.85B
quant PEP FY2025
us-gaap:Revenues = $93.92B
quant PEP FY2022
us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss = $8.91B
quant PEP FY2023
us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss = $9.07B
quant PEP FY2024
us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss = $9.58B
quant PEP FY2025
us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss = $8.24B
quant PEP FY2022
us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss = $11.51B
quant PEP FY2023
us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss = $11.99B
quant PEP FY2024
us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss = $12.89B
quant PEP FY2025
us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss = $11.50B
quant PEP FY2022
us-gaap:GrossProfit = $45.82B
quant PEP FY2023
us-gaap:GrossProfit = $49.59B
quant PEP FY2024
us-gaap:GrossProfit = $50.11B
quant PEP FY2025
us-gaap:GrossProfit = $50.86B
quant COST FY2022
us-gaap:Revenues = $226.95B
quant COST FY2023
us-gaap:Revenues = $242.29B
quant COST FY2024
us-gaap:Revenues = $254.45B
quant COST FY2025
us-gaap:Revenues = $275.24B
quant COST FY2022
us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss = $5.84B
quant COST FY2023
us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss = $6.29B
quant COST FY2024
us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss = $7.37B
quant COST FY2025
us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss = $8.10B
quant COST FY2022
us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss = $7.79B
quant COST FY2023
us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss = $8.11B
quant COST FY2024
us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss = $9.29B
quant COST FY2025
us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss = $10.38B